Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR

Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 417 appeals against the alleged complainant and his brother were also with the victim at the time of the incident, the Medico legal certificate showed that the injured witness was subsequently prosecuted. FLR, who was brought to the hospital, dismissed any allegation of the complainant's false allegations of false statement, which was the testimony of the accused, along with the prosecutor's testimony. Medical evidence was confirmed by the medical evidence. Supported this account at the time of the incident. Trial Court 6N that the score was not reinforced by the record because the record was not based on the correct definition of the evidence, the evidence of recovery of the blank had linked the accused to the commission of the crime, in forwarding the blank packet. The delay was unnecessary and the result was not the trial court's refusal to deny such evidence. The prosecution's witnesses were the deceased's real brothers, there was no basis for their testimony to be denied because they were material witnesses whose accused. There was no previous enmity with him as he was falsely implicated in this case, since the original B The High should release the original killer of his deceased brother and falsely add to the prosecution in which he, without any doubt, succeeded in establishing his case against the accused. The appeal was granted against and the judgment of the trial court was set aside and the accused was sentenced and sentenced accordingly. list of supreme court advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer