MST. FATIMA versus THE STATE
The Chemical Examiner refused to report on the first sample of exported opium and needed to send a new parcel so that any evidence available on record was defined by the Chemical Examiner's definition of Section 9 (c) evidence under the Drugs Act 1997 was not. Who produced the second parcel on which the positive report was obtained from the Chemical Examiner, so based on the above report, there was no further evidence on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime. The prosecution, under the circumstances, failed to bring the accused beyond the reasonable doubt of the house and accordingly was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Chaman lawyer
