Find a Lawyer

KHALID TEHAMI, ADVOCATE versus PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL

Amendment of Articles 41 (1) (2), 42 and 43 (5) of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973, against the Punjab Bar Council Jurisdiction's Anti-Corruption Committee Appellant was an allegation that it was anything other than legal. And was busy in business. The Provincial Bar Council was abusing this position as an Advocate Anti-Corruption Committee and a show cause notice was issued to the Appellant that the Committee failed to appear before the Bar Council, based on an order approved by the Anti. License issued to the issuer was canceled. Under the provisions of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973, the term committee of the corruption committee was able to admit the complaint and after the investigation the matter had to be referred to the tribunal for judgment which was capable of imposing any punishment provided. ? In SA1 (1) of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 and such order appeared before the Pakistan Bar Partners. Illegal legal provisions should not be exceeded or exceeded by any of the rules or procedures of the Provincial Bar Councils Authority for the confession of any complaint against any lawyer, while the provincial bar council's disciplinary committee shall be punished. The option to do so was made under the tribunal. Section 42 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 cannot be delegated to any authority to inquire into or prosecute an illegal committee which had no jurisdiction and the order passed by the Anti-Corruption Committee Appeal was allowed in the case. jobs for advocates from Warburton lawyer