Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus SYED MUMTAZ AHMED BURNEY

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Government Employees (Efficiency and Seizure) Rules, 1973, R4 (1) (b) (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) through mandatory retirement rehabilitation services in service As a result of the inquiry of the entire record, the government employee of the tribunal was essentially retired from the job because the department's inquiry charge against the civil servant was that he had filed property under section 17 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The perpetrator involved in the crime was released under the Evidence of Violation (Enforcement) Ordinance 1979. On the record it was revealed that the culprit was not interrogating a civil servant, but the investigation was done by some other officer who was under the sub-inspection officer of the present government employee, but he was not punished but the punishment for mandatory retirement on civil Was imposed. After a separate examination of the entire record, including the maid service tribunal, charge sheet, statement of allegations, showrunner notice and inquiry agent, Ort concluded that the allegations against the civil servant could not be substantiated, according to authorities. The appeal against the order passed was accepted by the service tribunal and the civil servant was reinstated, finding the validity of the service tribunal's services was unimaginable and did not guarantee any interference. The Supreme Court can grant when the cage is involved in a particular point of law and is of public importance immigration advocates contact from Hassan Abdal lawyer