Find a Lawyer

SYED RAHIM versus MAZHAR ALI

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 The plaintiff defendants were sued for eviction over being a tenant in a house owned by the defendant in the fact that the facts recorded by the courts were discovered That he has purchased the disputed house on the basis of the vendor sold. The defendants from whom they claimed to buy the property were not shown in the village property firm The defendants failed to sue how they became the owners of the suit property did not give any credibility / credibility to prove credibility. Not only did the plaintiff successfully prove ownership through the Revenue Record but also prove that the defendant was his tenant in the house disputed over payment of Khaskora (village traditional rent), the trial court ruled in this case. And the appeal against the trial court's ruling was dismissed. By the Court of Appeal, the exercise of jurisdiction exercised or the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction indicated, the two courts in favor of the Plaintiff High Court ruled that the courts rejected the unanimous result of the facts under review. Had done. In range famous supreme court advocate from Kazi Ahmed lawyer