CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Customs Act 1969 Section 19 SRO 554 (1) / 98, dated 12 6 1998 CBR: Letter C No. L (53) FISH / 90, Date 18 1G 2000 CBR Letter C No. Mach / 90, Date 8 5 2001 Sales Tax Act (VII) 1990 Clause), Exemption exemption on import of spare parts of machinery under Article 13 (1973), Article 99 Iron Petition SRO 554 (1) / 98 of Pakistan. The SRO video interpreted on 12.12 1998 was banned and rejected. CBR Letter CNA Mach (90) Mach / 90 90, dated 10 10 10 10 2001, under SER 554 (1) / 98, only spare parts were allowed and exempted from PCT validity. The relevant judiciary came under chips 84 and 85. It is the responsibility of working independently of such interpretations, instructions and instructions issued by the Central Board of Revenue when they decide the matters before them under the law and they are entitled to a claim before it. Cannot be denied because of the fact that the Central Board of Revenue granted a particular person. Interpretation of a particular clause, relevant law, rule or section
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
