Find a Lawyer

TANVEER AHMED TAHIR versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Rr 6 (iii) (a) and 6 (iii) (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant The ancestor of the applicant is from the Punjab province and his father was born in Punjab, but The applicant who was transferred to Sindh Province was born and educated in Karachi and the applicant and his father were issued a Domicile and Permanent Resident Certificate based on the Domicile and Permanent Resident Certificate Central Superior Service Exam. I appeared and passed the written test, but the authority accepted the applicant as competitive exam in Punjab. On the refusal of Sindh by the Authority to consider him as a candidate under the RR6 (4L) (A) and 6 (W) (H) of the Eight Rules, 1997, he has entered the Competitive Examination Rules. , The 1997 Constitution and Touchstone filed a constitutional petition to redress their grievances. Regarding the strict verbal application, the serious forensic dispute was the subject and the matter was pending in the High Court's Division Bench, which ruled that Article 15, 25 and 27 of the Constitution constitution Are ultra-virus. Pakistan and the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal the decision and suspended its proceedings. The High Court considered it binding on the Division Bench decision and unlike the Supreme Court, no verdict was made, and no one was present on its behalf. The authority, before the court, directs the constitutional petition filed by the applicant to treat the applicant as a candidate from urban Sindh, but the decision will remain suspended for two weeks. divorce advocates from Wana lawyer