Find a Lawyer

SAIFAL versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) and 324 testimonials were well known to the accused witness and the identity of the victim could not be denied on the spot in the headlight of the motorcycle. Defense did not challenge the presence. And neither did he disagree. On the occasion, along with his father (deceased) on the motorcycle record, the injured witness gave no reason to falsely include the accused in the case and to kill his father and release the real culprits, who had given medical evidence. He was critically injured by firing. At the relevant time, the presence of witnesses was proved on the relevant occasion and the identity of the accused was not open to any suspicion, only the evidence of the witness could not be excluded because of his relationship with the deceased. There was also a fragment of ground-like situation near the body of the deceased's body located at the site of the recovery of the blood. A limited agreement was presented for the prosecution's trial on the proper examination of the evidence. Properly the accused was found guilty of the crime and the verdict rendered by him was unthinkable. immigration advocates email from Nowshero Feroz lawyer