NASIR versus THE STATE
Under the definition of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392/34, 353/34 and 324/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7B West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (AX of 1965), Section 13D Evidence C is not with the guilt of a simple lawyer. Murder or adultery was not a fixed offense and thus could not be punished under Articles 353 and 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. PPC was also not a crime committed under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. Could not be prosecuted against counter-terrorism. Unless the court virtually commits a crime under the aforesaid act, as the PPC was not made competent under section 3 353 and 44 32, any offense under the Arms Ordinance The penal code shall not be the same as the offense mentioned above under the Code of Conduct. The complainant of the Anti-Terrorism Court complainant identified the accused in the Identity Test Parade and in the court as well, while filing under oath was also separatist. Impressed by the sentence, the PPC was subsequently set aside and instead sentenced under Section 7B of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and sentenced to seven years in prison. 353/34 and 324/34, were also signed under Section 13D of the PPC and the Arms Ordinance and it was directed by the sessions court to re-hear it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Gujar Khan lawyer