Find a Lawyer

M. MUNAF SHAIKH versus QURESH ALI, ADVOCATE

Balochistan Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 41 Complaint of Professional Misconduct At the time of reporting to the Provincial Bar Council, filing false information at the time of registration of the Provincial Bar Council, they filed an affidavit stating that they had terminated any government job complaint. I am not an employee. It was alleged that at the time of the notification, the defendant was serving as a school teacher in the public school. On the record, it was proved that the defendant was an active public servant in the Department of Education and was regularly drawing salary which affected him. The air where the material facts were suppressed and the false oath was. Submitted by the defendants at the Provincial Bar Council, such action of the respondents was not only against the Bar Council rules but also against the Canon of Conduct and Ethics prescribed for the Advocate Tribunal. There was no desired seizure in the country and due to the absence of strict discipline in the profession, the disciplinary rules were easily violated. Reflection, therefore, it would not be appropriate to keep the relevant facts deliberately hidden. Deliberately filing a false affidavit as a mere mistake was found liable for criminal and professional misconduct and was practically removed under section 41 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973, The PPC, however, was responsible for legal proceedings under Section 191. The court did not order his tender apology and plea seeking criminal mercy against him. ask a advocate free from Muzaffarabad lawyer