Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 1072/KB OF 2000-2001 versus I.T.A. NO. 1072/KB OF 2000-2001

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66A, 62, 80D & Second Schedule, C1 (118D) Additional Commissioner's Inspection Options for Revision of Deputy Commissioner's Order ACCE 153,462 972 for the duration of 8 trial productions Announced the sale of Rs. Assessment officer was paid to the tax from 1993 to 3093 1993 (assessment year 1994 95) and section 80 13, while commercial production while finalizing the assessment for the year 1995 96 under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The date was declared 1 10. The Additional Commissioner, who inspected 1993, is expected to revise the assessment for the assessment year 1995 96 and the production date was taken as 8 4 1993 instead of 1 10 1993 and it has been stated that the sale of such value will be tested. Cannot be declared as a result, the exemption from the exemption of the SC is exempted under the C1 (118d) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, after a period of 5 years 1979 to 8 4 1993 to 8 4 1998 1998 As per the inspection allowed to be valid, the Additional Commissioner's immunity prediction will start from 8 199 1993 and not from 1 10 1993, which means that the income after 8 1998 is taxable. However, as per the original assessment, income tax will be taxable after 30 after 1998 iii. If there was a mistake, then to find out the correct date. Iii. Commercial production started. ? 96 Income Taxes It was not that the Assessment Year 1995 was a taxable tax on the income tax revenue that would have allowed the Assessment. The waiver that was not inspected between 8 4 1998 and 30 9 1998 did not clearly state that in fact for a period of approximately 6 months Pakistan, top advocate family court from Battagram lawyer