Find a Lawyer

versus

Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 2 (46), Proviso & 3 (1A) Section R: O208 (I) / 98, Dated 31 3 1998 Section RA 818 (1) / 99, Dated 5 7 1999 Section RO 751 (I) / 2000, Date 21 10 2000 Supply Price Sugar Adjusting Officer demanded sales tax and additional sales tax on sugar supply from February 2000 to July 2000, which was actually charged because the section. R818 (I) / 99, dated 5th 1999, which fixed the price of sugar tax at Rs 14 per kg, which was aimed at collecting sales tax, was valid till January 2000, Assisi requested. Section RO 751 (1) / 2000, 21 dated 2000, made illegal. The Former Rate Effect Department argued that the Central Board of Revenue does not have the authority to issue the same effect as Section R above, as it was against the prohibition of section 2 (46) of the Sales Tax Act 1990. As per the instruction in Section R0751 (1) of the Central Board of Revenue, sales tax at Rs 14 per kg before, according to Section O 751 accuracy of date 21 10 2000, ultra-virus and non-volatile on 21 10 2000. After declaring his presence, the tribunal established the judicial officer's inquiry, but in the absence of appeals or cross-objections filed by the department against the results, the tribunal did not, to that extent, modify the sales tax act. No illegality or error was found in the receipt of further tax under S.S. 3 of the 1990 (LA). attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Islamabad lawyer