SALES TAX APPEAL NO.472/LB OF 1999 versus SALES TAX APPEAL NO.472/LB OF 1999
Sections 33 and 34 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 were taxed extra tax and penalty for non-payment of timely sales tax amount was imposed on various parties irrespective of whether any facts. They have something to do with it. The assistants, among others, claimed that they made all payments well before the delivery of the goods, and that if there was a default in payment, this could be the result of instability of some procedure and not intentionally or The deliberate default accuracy is the fact that the actual sales amount was paid well by the department before the supply of goods was profitable, so in this case the additional tax and penalty burden It was not permissible to saddle the SCCC when the order of the department was declared illegal, void and void. Legal impact through a tribunal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
