UZMA BUKHARI versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, FAISALABAD
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Educational Institution Intra Court appealed to the appellant to amend the rules before the commencement of the examination. I entered and submitted my admission. In December 1992 1992 through college, the college through the form, when the original rules were enforced in accordance with 19 2 198 198 198 198, in order to qualify for the provision of an intermediate certificate, If qualified in the subjects, three consecutive exam opportunities were provided. Prior to the commencement of the appellant's examination in 600 No. 10 4 1993, on the first attempt, the authorities amended the rules on 6 3 1993, whereby the rights which they had in the previous rules were reduced. All seven papers had to appear, but he took the test. Four papers, while the other three, were absent, but they failed to show the result card. In the constitutional petition, it was claimed under the rules that it would not affect his case, but he was dismissed. Legitimate notification cannot be issued with the doctrine of ex parte effect in the proceedings under the Preamble Act and affecting its entitlement; the disappointment of the subordinate legislative authority can be applied till then. Unless the law authorizes it to do so, the appeal filed by the appellant is not accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Leepa lawyer