Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus LAL KHAN

Limitations Act 1908 Section 12 (2) and Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), EXLI Required Expression of time required to obtain certified copies of R2 certified copies, indicating required time and scope of ression time The judgment and decree were passed on 5 6 1978, and on the same day the appellant applied for his certified copies, but before his delivery, he had obtained 10 copies of the trial court's order and certified copies of the decree. The petition was made on 6 1978 and the judgment of the appellate court was delivered on 13 6 1978 and the appeal was filed on 13 9 1978. The dispute was that the appeal was withheld for two days and The appellant had not filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the court could not delay, the trial decision and the validity of filing a copy of the decree were required along with the notice of the second appeal, Therefore, the time requirements used in section 12 (2) of the Limitation Act 1908 will also cover the time spent in obtaining such copies. f 13 197 The limitations of the appellate court's decision and decree will not begin to run in 1978, as it was already withheld by the second application of 10 6 8 1978, when threshold 1 7 began to run in 1978, when, Copies of the trial court's decision and order were delivered, the appellant had the right to be excluded from the period of restriction under section 12 (2) of the Limitation Act, 1908, while section 5 of the limitation Act 1908 The provisions were also arbitrary and there was no question under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, nor was it the duty of the appellants to make such application in such circumstances. The appeal was not timely barred. top advocate from Silanwala lawyer