Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus SAEED HUSSAIN

Seeking to repeal the Articles 39 and 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, for the annulment and termination of a contract of sale in which he allegedly claimed to have been forged, sought to have the execution of the sale deed executed and Similarly, the result of the fraud and forgery was on the plaintiff. Prove that the crime of sale was the result of forgery and forgery, but failed to exclude that the documentary evidence presented by the defendants by oral or documentary evidence proved the execution of the registered sale deed. Did not deny its signing of a sale agreement. In cases where accusations cannot be made without explaining the details of the fraud, in the absence of any misrepresentation or reading of evidence by the courts below, the final result of their fact shows that the registered The Sale Conviction is right and that the plaintiff fails to prove fraud and fabrication charges, hi's review jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the GH Court. family advocate from Taxila lawyer