Find a Lawyer

MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus EHSAN-UL-HAQ

Articles 2 and 3 of the Evacuation and Displaced Persons Act (repealed) Act 1975 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of the Constitution Order Allotment Order affecting the land allotment in favor of the aggrieved person Laches Altis Not done. Revenue Records and Land, named after the central government, approached the Revenue Authorities to enforce the allocation order in their favor, but did not succeed and provided their case with full opportunity to file a constitutional petition. Later, a remand was obtained for his decision. The relevant authority, in compliance with the High Court order, decided to give the land to the concerned authorities in the case of already selling the health department to the hospital for any other citizen available evacuation against their pending units. The land should be allotted. The constitutional petition was challenged in the constitutional application by the Member, Provincial Board of Revenue that the authority had no jurisdiction to approve this order because the notification officer had no authority to order the allotment against the pending units. There was no jurisdiction. The valid constitutional petition was misunderstood because the applicant was not a provocative person and there was no Lux Standi to apply. The Allies were trying to enforce the Allotment Orders before 1961 before they were approved. And if any property was allotted against their pending units, the applicant, who was a public servant, or someone else in the matter, was unlikely to suffer any harm. Allowed against pending claim property advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer