Find a Lawyer

BARKAT ALI versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Demands for Section 57 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, in connection with the verification of the gift of suit in relation to the suit property by the person enrolled in the record of the appropriate pending proceedings in the civil court, began with respect to a dispute over the income tax In connection with the inheritance dispute, the gift collector's justification dispute was initiated before the parties were instructed to acquire their jurisdiction through the competent jurisdiction as the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act Was considered under section 53 of 1967. And then the Member, the Board of Revenue as well as the question of collector's right to dispute and the question about the gift cannot be decided by the Revenue Officer through the process, which was summarized by the parties. I should also be instructed. The collector's civil court order was subject to the provisions of section 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, while orders passed by the Additional Commissioner and Member Board of Revenue resulted in incorrect reading or non-reading of the record, Revenue no longer had the option of correcting heritage entries. The summary action member, the Board of Revenue, responded to the order of the Additional Commissioner, which was not valid in the view of the law passed by the member, in review, the Board of Revenue did not include the reasons because it made the law case. Did not take into account the relevant provisions. Member, Board of Revenue was remanded to decide on a review of the law after exercising its free mind family advocate from Malakand lawyer