SHER MUHAMMAD versus ATTA MUHAMMAD
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 (b) (c) sought to dismiss the plaintiff's plea for termination of the case on the basis that it was tried The plaintiff is lacking. Not long after the expiry of the delimitation date and due to the court's fee not being properly sealed, the plaintiff will be dismissed. The defendant's claim was to meet the reduction of court fees after the expiration of the term. The trial was largely fatal because of the limitation. The Limitation Trial Court was fully authorized to allow the plaintiff time to pay the court fees and, in compliance with these court orders, would be deemed to have been paid court fees previously. The question of example and limitation does not arise
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Daur lawyer
