Find a Lawyer

HAKIM MUMTAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 497 (1) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3 (2) on bail that allegedly engaged in the sale of opium, FIR According to him, he was also sold to Deco Customers and the smuggled money was recovered from his possession, the accused was stabbed with 142 grams of opium. The accused involved in the CRPC drug trade did not deserve any relaxation or sympathy. There was no room for release of the invoice within 14 days when the High Court was hearing the bail application. The accused secured bail from the sessions court. It was enough for the High Court to prevent the accused from obtaining bail from the Sessions Court by concealing the fact that his application was applied for the same purpose. The accused (applicant) was assisted by the Sessions Court, 17 days after the trial was registered, in which case the Sessions Court dismissed the accused's request for bail, after which the accused was granted bail by the High Court. Had applied. It is presumed that not furnishing the challan for 14 days is a valid ground for grant of bail, then the said ground was also available to the accused when the first bail application was dismissed, when the case was filed for hearing, the accused. The lawyer seeking permission to seek permission from the concerned jail was not allowed to withdraw the bail plea, it was revealed that the accused had already been released on bail by the same court before which Refused to approve bail. The first guarantee through sessions how to become a advocate from Chiniot lawyer