GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH ADVOCATE GENERAL, SINDH, KARACHI versus A.M. QURESHI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Sections 17 (2) (i), (8), (9) and 2 (g) (s) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 constitute the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article L85 (3) Landlord and Tenant, Payment. The tenant's relationship attacking the tenant's defense failed to comply with the default rental order in respect of the applicant / tenant submission, defending the tenant to the landlord and tenant between the parties. Denied the clerk's relationship was hit, the HC remanded the case remanded the first rent controller landlord and the tenant of the Supreme Court High Court tenant In order not to appear on remand for the decision to keep, the rent controller appeared to defend his case, despite the landlord appearing and adding further evidence. The record, based on the proof of his claim and illegal proof of rent control, the order to evict the tenant holding the tenant defaulting in the payment of rent and the order of the rent controller were maintained under the HC order. The High Court cannot be interfered with by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer