Find a Lawyer

SOLAT ALI KHAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code S Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (1) (a) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), MP Article 185 (3) Was a testimony of strength. The eyewitness did not impress the witnesses and their evidence cannot be believed because they were interested and were witnesses of the occasion. Given that the parade was held after 530 days, it cannot be used as a contention for ocular testimony. This confession is the result of violence and was made at a time when the accused was arrested and no other case could be used in this case, nor was the recovery proven in accordance with the law nor was it possible to link the accused. Enough. Along with the crime, the leave of appeal was given to the accused to consider contempt of court and to examine and examine the evidence on record to determine whether the accused was convicted and reported to the Supreme Court. The conviction was based on the principles laid down. From time to time for the administration of justice law websites from Rohri lawyer