ALAM BIBI versus AKBAR ALI
Conan e evidence Order 1984 Article 129 (g) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), 5 100 Controversial fact The plaintiff himself was a witness to the fact that the absence of the plaintiff during the trial was decided in the Panchayat and the defendant. According to the agreement, the trial court in the Revenue Record ruled in favor of the plaintiff and the trial court's decision and order was first suspended by the appellate court, not to appear before the defendant himself during the trial. Will create pride against. The best person to be dismissed at the meeting of the Panchayat of which was compromised and this is proof that he had compromised, which was eventually brought to the Revenue Authority where the appellate court had given all the evidence. And after finding out the fact, the High Court refused to interfere with the findings of the First Appeal Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mandra lawyer
