Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Sections 12 and 21 (4) apply for CPC separation of the Ex parte Decree, keeping the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 of M8), I IX, R 13 Ex parte decree, OAX, R 13. O was filed under IX. Not under Section 12 of the R13, CPC and Banking Companies (Recovery of loans, advances, credits and financials) Act, 1997 in the presence of any special provision provided by the relevant law, namely the section of the banking companies 12 and 21 (Recovery) Loans, advances, credits and financial matters (relying on Act 1997, AIX, R 13), CPC was unnecessary and under O IX, R 13 the request to the banking court was not appropriate, CPC Was deemed invalid as a prerequisite for application of section 12 of the banking. The Companies (Lending, Promotion, Credit and Financial Transaction) Act, 1997 was lacking, the Banking Court rightly rejected the application filed under OIX, R13, CPC, where the Banking Court order Was in pursuit of legal status. [n case, the High Court denied i nterfer with the same appeal was dismissed advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer