MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus LIAQAT ALI
Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI Generally O VI, R 17 and Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 185 (3) apply for the applicant's request for modification under section 12 (2), The effect of this to the CPC is that the applicant can guide the evidence but is subject to admissibility under the law. The applicants stated that since the facts were not stated in the original application under CPC, the defendant could raise the objection that there was no evidence. Guided about the facts, which were not new facts, but were merely the breadth or details of the fraudulent application filed in the original application and, if modification was allowed, the respondents also had a chance to meet it. And present evidence for completion. The accuracy of the record shows that the petitions raised in the amendment petition were in fact the practical form of a fraudulent application in the central application, therefore, knowing the respondents' knowledge that the applicant wanted to establish a different case than the one already made. That was not true and thus the amendment that was abolished was attempted, in fact, was the one that should have been allowed to do full justice and decide the dispute. Especially and effectively be born between the parties
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Qalandarabad lawyer