ABDUL QADIR versus HAMAYUN JAFFAR
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (3) (ii), Impact of Tenant Tenants 'Impact of Requirement for a Special Period by the Landlord for the Individual Owners' Advance Rent Period That the landlords had received rent in advance and the tenants could not be evicted until then, the ploy raised by the landlords was that if the lease was vacated by the tenants, they would be subject to the West Pakistan civilian rent restriction. The ordinance was ready to return the 1959 advance rent, allow for freedom of contract based on equality At the time of the acquisition, the landlord should have known that he was recovering from his personal need. After accepting the rent before a certain date, the landlord declared himself ineffective because he gave the tenants something else. Was. After receiving advance rent as compared to the existing tenancy, the landlord was not eligible to submit the application for eviction. Against the tenants on the basis of personal need, the amount received till then was adjusted, the tenant West Pakistan. Citizens' rent restrictions cannot be excluded from the benefits of this provision under section 13 (3) (ii) of the Ordinance, 1959. The landlords had no help because the purpose for which this money was paid was to cover the rent where the tenancy was for a specific period, with no personal need to evict the tenants. ? The rent controller was set aside as per the appeal allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer