Find a Lawyer

IZHAR ALI SHAH versus SHAHBAZ

Section 302 (b) criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2a) was the color of truth surrounding the ocular testimony of the appeal against evil and he expressed confidence that the witnesses with the deceased were my witnesses. Relationships were not enough to be unbelievers. The truth was told and it was not his intention to substitute the accused with the real culprit. Since no weapon was recovered from the accused, he could be acquitted of his involvement in the crime which resulted in the death of two persons. However, he did confirm the ocular testimony, however, that the deceased suffered injuries to non-vital parts of his body and was responsible for the prosecution of his co-accused, who was absconding and responsible for the victim's death. ? In 1992, the accused was convicted under Section 302 (b), PPC, on two fines for murder of two persons and each was sentenced to life imprisonment. The conditions were directed to the accused to operate in connection with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC. top advocate from Kashmir lawyer