ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH versus NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH
Article 17 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), Section 54 Suit for specific performance of the contract, the execution of the contract depending on the document which was rejected by the parties. , It has to be confirmed. According to the law, adherence was to adhere to the principle of best evidence and if such evidence was not presented, the standard of proof required to prove the document was to comply with the agreement to sell it to the plaintiff. Imports will suffer. An author who was not a legacy defendant and who apparently could not have made an entry in the legacy registry, so the testimony of such an authorization was, therefore, not worth the author's statement. Because he was the only one who signed it. Its an author and not a witness, usually the author writes the document and signs the document before the executive signs the ness No evidence of a contract to sell was presented, the contract itself. Will not prove and his receipt was not proved by strong and independent direct evidence; the judgment and judgment passed by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff was properly set aside by the appellant. The court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Buchay Key lawyer