Find a Lawyer

AHMAD DIN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337 (A) (D) (F) / 426/427/148/149/109/118/34 It was alleged that when the FIR was lodged, the complainant was not present and his signature in the FIR was false and even before the trial court had confirmed the signature of the complainant during the proceedings of the case. The trial court record disclosed that the complainant appeared before the Judicial Magistrate and recorded his statement, adding that the accused was involved in the alleged crime and his complaint was filed in his presence, Ftys complete challan was presented in the trial court and read out the charges. Nothing was done in violation of the law and no illegal proceedings or irregularities were found which could have led to the order to terminate the trial after the proceedings began and some of the prosecution witnesses, Hwy Ng. Examined, termination of proceedings at such a stage would cause serious prejudice to the complaining party trial court, thus, it correctly concluded that the case taken by the accused was It is not enough to dismiss the case and acquit the accused. immigration advocates from Mubarik Pur lawyer