INAYAT ALI versus MUBASHIR ALI
The Returning Officer has no charge in the jurisdiction of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 RR 39 (5), 40 (6), 81 and 83 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 counting the counting of votes. has been. The petition states that some votes that should be counted in favor of unsuccessful candidates, were not counted or some votes that should not have beer: were counted in favor of the lost candidate, unsuccessful candidates. Had withdrawn other grounds raised in the tire election. On the basis of the petition and the re-counting, the Election Tribunal allowed the application in the condition that the election decision be made on the basis of the count of validity where the election petition failed to disclose any grounds on which the returning candidates Can be placed within the meaning of. Non-governmental election rules 2000, application for invalidating the election on the basis of R 81 or R of 83 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000, became the cause of illegal proceedings, Punjab Local Government. No ground was approved in the scope of either R39 (5) or R40 (6) of the Election Rules 2000. For re-counting by the Election Tribunal, an order of the Election Tribunal was issued without any legal authority, the case was returned to the Election Tribunal for re-decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer