WALI MUHAMMAD THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS versus REHMAT ALI
The justification for the partial disturbance, which was related to the will, was not within the bounds of the land sold but rather on adjacent land and in the dispute the land had the right to cultivate from the well which was in dispute with the land. The adjoining dispute is that the land has been sold along with the will, therefore, the plaintiff had to vacate it whilst the plaintiff did not mention it in the will, therefore, it should have been considered partially. The pre-occupation case was stopped, it was only right to cultivate the land from the wells that were linked to the lands in dispute. The rights and liabilities associated with land and enjoy the same will enjoy it. The person who sold the whole land
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Naukot lawyer
