SHAH NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 324 Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt when the evidence of both the eyes could not be relied primarily on the contradiction of each other, then the trial court also had to disregard the complainant's evidence. Should have The aforementioned specs depend on the evidence of the witnesses, that the complainant is an interested person who must always look at the facts stated in the FIR for grinding his ax and the evidence presented by the prosecution is the version of the complainant. The defendant was convicted, but this depends on the testimony of the evidence by the trial court's observations after the trial court strongly rejected the evidence of the two key witnesses. Complete reliance on the statement of the donor should not have been eliminated. The conviction of the accused, as it was beyond reasonable doubt to substantiate the case against the accused, is that the sole purpose of the complainant is to punish the accused, relying solely on the evidence was not sufficient. It was so good to conclude the trial court's decision that if the accused was not relied upon and mitigated, circumstances were available, then the accused had to be acquitted on the benefit of the doubt, the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Manoabad lawyer