Find a Lawyer

YUSUF. ALI SHAH versus QUETTA SERENA HOTEL THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O12 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint request hearing At the time of appeal, the employee's commitment to the position of the employee was not treated as an employee / worker nor treated with any other employee as the employee complained to the Labor Court as well as the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Application dismissed. And the unanimous decisions of the appellate courts, which were upheld in the constitutional petition before the High Court, were dismissed. The employee's argument was that he made a statement before the Labor Court about the absence of any evidence. Did not give Observing that the forum which did not arise before the forum which leased the forum in industrial classification could not be allowed to discuss the Relations Ordinance, 1969 for the first time during the constitutional proceedings, respectively, the Labor Court and Labor. There was nothing wrong with the decisions made by the appellate tribunal, allowing the High Court to intervene in the exercise. Its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution best law firms from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer