Find a Lawyer

ZAHORAN MAI versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), no direct evidence was available against the accused 302/364/34 and the only evidence to prove the charges against them was relied upon by the prosecution. Was. Final evidence The conduct of the prosecution witnesses was very unnatural as they knew that the deceased had gone with the accused, they should have gone to the accused's house immediately, rather than to find them here and / or immediately. Police should have filed their report soon after. The deceased prosecution found no signs of torture on the body of the deceased, but was silent on how and when the witnesses found out that the accused had committed misconduct before the death and resisted the accused. Who killed him, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt, he was acquitted because a large vacuum arose in the prosecution's case. us immigration advocates from Punch lawyer