ABDUL GHAFOOR versus M.B.R
Death of one of the applicants during the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 164 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), Para 25 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXII, R 3 During the petitioner's death and the Member, the Board of Revenue approved the order without any amendment, the High Court passed the remand of the case without implementing the legal representatives of the deceased order while the previous orders were passed by the Board of Revenue. The sources were approved when the applicant was alive. After the remand of the case by the High Court, he died, it was obligatory on the second applicant to bring the deceased applicant's legal representatives on record and it was the duty of the deceased legal representatives to come forward and ask the parties for a review. Be. The petitioner's son was also one of the deceased's legal heirs, and it cannot be said that the order was passed without the legal representative being enforced and the common interest of the accused and other applicants exists. The victim's son, who opposed the review, was not prejudiced by the unlawful order and other legal representatives of the deceased. This amendment will not be terminated and this order may be granted without the legal enforcement of the deceased's legal representatives.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Punch lawyer