Find a Lawyer

CHIRAGH DIN versus SUBA

Succession Act 1925 Section 21 (b) Securities Act (XXXXX of 1925), Section 33 (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 115 Government landlord The tenant successor parties were not the original tenants and the tenancy dispute. I was successful. The succession began when the widow of the original tenant had transferred her share, the appellate court decided the case in accordance with the provisions of section 33 (b) of the section Act, 1925, because the parties were Christian in faith. The Appellate Court, legally held that the position in the background of the case where there is no basis in section 115, CPC for the purpose of asserting jurisdiction, the Appellate Court has held that the appellate court Denied interference with review with decision. divorce advocates from Kandhkot lawyer