Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ACHAR MACHI versus THE STATE

Section 9 (b) definitions of evidence under the Drugs Act 1997 depend on the daily entry that showed the time and date when the complainant went out to patrol with other police officers, but said That the inquiry had not been previously submitted by the prosecutor. The trial court may have speculated that the police party had not left the relevant police station for patrol and that the suspects had fallen into the hands of the police to maintain their pockets; Was sent after And stated that the delay was not disclosed, statement was not found under section 342; CRPC had clearly violated the provisions of section 342 (2) of the accused on the first page of the statement. The PC prosecution failed miserably. Upon the trial of the accused, the trial court's decision to pass and sentence was set aside and he was thought to be released soon. property advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer