Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASUL versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 para 25 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (of 1913), Section 4 Tenant and the former right of suicide attacker filed two cases in advance of the claim by one appellant and the other by the appellant. Was claimed. On the basis of suicide, the respondents filed a case under the provisions of Para 25 of the Land Reform Regulation 1972, on the basis of the tenancy, and the Revenue Authorities Appellant had to submit the order before filing a tax related order. Had ordered instead. Appellant's trial was heard before the Civil Court by the trial court and the Appellate High Court upheld the decision, allowed the appeal to be exercised in the jurisdiction of the appeal, and the judgment was passed by the trial court and the lower appellate court. The endorsement was put aside by the appellant. The Revenue Authorities have not accepted any exemptions in the ratings provided under para 25 of the Land Reforms Regulation, 19. 72 and instead the respondent's civil court pre-emption suit was specifically sued by the collector on the pretrial hearing and the same was given to the tenant for the right of pre-bail granted to the tenants. The civil court could not be examined. The Land Reform Regulation, 1972, was high in nature and in the event of a collision, the tenants had to prevail that the High Court had refused to intervene in the decision. jobs for advocates from Astore lawyer