MESSRS CONTINENTAL FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED versus AITZAZ AHMED KHAN
High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders Vol 5, Chapter 3 (b), R1 (iii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Order Appeal Against Judicial Request, Order Against Tenant was approved And the appeal against the order was adjourned before the High Court as the first appeal against the order of the High Court Single Judge was decided and it was rejected. The tenant's argument was that the appeal was heard by the High Court. The Division Bench should have done, not through it. Under the provisions of Vo1 V, Chap 3 (b), R 1 (iii) of the High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, the single appeal against the order is the first appeal where a single High Court judge has heard. The tenant himself had requested the trial court's order as an appeal under the CPC order, and at the same time the tenant could not argue that he should have the same matter before the Division Bench of the High Court. Should be regular because the Supreme Court refused to accept the appeal of the tenant and the Leave to One People was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Dhoun Kal lawyer