Find a Lawyer

IMRAN RAZA KHAN, ADVOCATE versus S. S. P., LAHORE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3 and 4 contempt of court in which the Chief Justice suffered unpleasant treatment ended with a welcome note when the Chief Justice granted judicial restriction. Used and proceeded to constitute a full bench for the aforesaid reasons, he did not choose to proceed under Article 204 of the Constitution with the contempt of court Act, 1976, and the matter was referred to the Member Left to collective conscience. The Bar Advocate expressed his unconditional regret before the full bench before the next hearing, saying that he regrets the incident and it seems that from his heart the Vice-Chairman of the High Court Bar Association, Pakistan Bar Council And she's sorry. The Chairman, Executive Committee, Punjab Bar Council also expressed the same sentiments and said that if any matter was brought to them, they would be upset. Due to its strict handling of the legal framework and the chariot bar of the administration of justice, it was controversial and controversial to hear violent language. During a hearing by the judge for some reason the system was alien to the administration of justice, to resolve the dispute between the parties peacefully and through an impartial procedure by an independent judicial administration of justice. Was one of the basic methods. An explicit method of using physical force to resolve their disputes through armed confrontations and bloodshed and parties, such a system was adorned with decent behavior, and such objectives were strong and independent judiciary. law websites from Nankana Sahib lawyer