Demand for ransom was not proved by the Pakistan Penal Code Section 365A & 149 evidence, and the complainant's abductor said that when he was being taken with the robbers, he ransomed someone to release him. Upon demanding a bribe, she was handed over to her relatives, but the prosecution failed to examine a relative of the alleged brother of the complainant (the alleged abduction) whom the prosecution had examined, according to the prosecution. The case was not supported and the accused was not identified accordingly. In the police lockup, the procedure shown to the accused complainant had lost his dignity. Gone. The alleged incident and the delay revealed that the trial court acquitted the accused on the same evidence. NG failed to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt against the accused, was sentenced by the trial court and set aside and granted the benefit of the doubt and acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
