Find a Lawyer

MISS GUL ROOKH SARFARAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY,N-.-W.F.P.

Federal Government Business Rules Schedule 2, Entry No. 36 (i) (o) Rules and Regulations (Government of the North West Frontier Province), 1985, Paris 4 and 41 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), Educational Fata In his constitutional application for the special seats in the medical and dental colleges of the Border Parliament regarding the admission of candidates from the High Court before the High Court and in the 13 Dental Colleges, the admission policy was challenged on the basis that the provincial government. Is not an option Make a policy that contradicts the policy already reported by the federal government and was the same discrimination that was rejected by the High Court. The petitioners filed a leave petition for appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court order. Applicants failed to identify a law or regulation that could be said to have been created and administered under the structure of admissions policy medical colleges. Under Para 41 of the Provincial Government and the Rules of Business (Border Government of the Province), 1985, the case related to the admission of candidates from tribal areas against specific seats in medical and other professional colleges was under the admission policy of the provincial government. The Joint Admissions Committee was formed in consultation with the Secretary, Government of Pakistan, and the development of the socially backward people of the same area, in their major interest, gave the High Court good and sound reasons for the removal of the Constitution Number. ???? Discount may be sought in the High Court advocate for immigration from Toru lawyer