JAMAL DIN versus MUHAMMAD AZIZ
In the jurisdiction of the Civil Court Bar Courts under the West Pakistan Stabilization Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 26, it was decided that the order passed by the Consolidation Officer in the absence of the respondent was void and that All subsequent orders were also rejected because the defendant's deficiency in the original original order was passed without confirming the opportunity for a hearing because of the fact that the defendant had not been heard, since his subsequent action Where defendant had the opportunity to hear about the court's finding that All orders were approved. After the original order through the Revenue Forums, the ban was void, could not be sustained, especially since the lower courts had no jurisdiction in the matter of the Revenue Forum's harmonization decisions and the lower courts were in favor of the respondents. The order was set aside by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Hattian lawyer
