The testimony of section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, was attributed to both witnesses, who had a case of alleged mutiny, complaint and malice against the accused and was not proved by independent and unwanted witnesses. And for him it was impossible. The investigating officer exposed the most free and undesirable respectable persons of the local prosecution indirectly, ridiculous, imaginative, unnatural, and impossible. The statements of the two eyewitnesses described each other in terms of time, place of recovery and recovery. Didn't agree. From the point where the prosecution's witnesses joined the story of the investigating officer's prosecution, the prosecution's witnesses turned out to be untrustworthy, relying on their statements in a criminal case would be extremely dangerous. That he had actually encountered. Trial and sentencing the accused sent to the ial court by Tr and the accused acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
