Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus AZHAR ABBAS

Sections 2 (1) (a), 5 (1) and 10 (1) (ii) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974, Article 212 (3) ad hoc appointments in various departments of the Provincial Government, preliminary periods. Upon termination, most were continued for a period of six months, and their ad hoc appointments were periodically extended from the service of their respective departments through various orders issued on appeal by the Service Tribunal. ? He was able to hold office and continue on the order of termination of employment until regular election was made available through the prescribed method and the relevant departments of the provincial government in accordance with the law dispute it. The Service Tribunal failed to understand that the Chief Minister of the province had made the appointment for political purposes and the departments had to comply with the order of the Chief Minister. Interference due to unnecessary political pressure, although this decision was approved by the Chief Minister without observing the legitimate procedure. The service tribunal also failed to recognize that the government had no legal obligation to extend the service term of an ad hoc appointee, which would not have been extended by the government under the relevant rules. So he was responsible for eliminating it. That the Government is in favor of terminating the services of such ad hoc employees under section 10 (3) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act of 1974 and the removal of regular elected committees for the removal of ad hoc employees under section 10 (s) was not a condition. 3) Despite the leave of appeal despite the provisions of Sections 10 (1) and (2) of the Act, the Act itself was a code which the Supreme Court approved that the public in this case solicitors from Thari Mirwah lawyer