Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SHABBIR SHAH versus MUHAMMAD USMAN

The plaintiff claimed that he was the exclusive owner of the land in the dispute, and that the defendant, on the aforesaid ground, had obtained possession of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXX, R12 suit. Exceeded and was unauthorized. On its construction, the plaintiff did not specifically deny the plaintiff's title in connection with the residential plot in the dispute, testified in evidence of his claim, and in this regard the plaintiff had a copy of the record of rights and The defendant's trial court ruled on the evidence, concluding with the evidence, but the appellate court overlooked the evidence, proving its title in connection with the plot and unauthorized encroachment on the dispute. Commissioner of the trial court permanently appointed, visited the site under the order of the High Court and thereby According to the report submitted, the Commissioner also supported the case of finding the Appellant plaintiff late because the court could not be proved to be misleading and based on misinterpretation of the evidence, the High Court, under the use of its revised scope, appealed. The court set aside the decision below. famous lower court advocate from Kasur lawyer