Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Section 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 of the Sindh Revenue Jurisdiction Act (X of 1876), declaration of section 11 suit and any permissible suit for the plaintiff at any time on the suit land. Or had no legal title and according to various orders passed by the Revenue Authorities, the plaintiff sought to illegally occupy the land which was legally given to the defendant and the plaintiff could not challenge those orders. The matter was not feasible to be related to the Revenue Civil Suite, but it mentioned Molla individual. The case will not give the civil court jurisdiction to sit on the decision of the trial tribunals on the dispute involved in the case, after examining every aspect of the appellate court's case, the trial court's decision Put aside Plaintiff fails to disclose any illegal, material irregularities or judicial defeats at points of law as well as facts, interference with CT / error in High Court review jurisdiction No case has been revealed. law firms from Kakul lawyer