Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus INDIA CEMENTS LTD.


Indian Income Tax Act 1961 Troubleshooting The amount paid by a company to a managing agent under the Companies Act, which is deducted by the ITO for the year 1967, thereafter Under the ITO Passing Order does not allow the portion of the compensation as it was actually in a higher deduction, the jurisdiction authorized by the ITO was in accordance with the decision of the High Court when the order was approved by the ITO under section 154. At that time, there was no record of any wrongdoing in the records of the assessment year 1967 68 which led to the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 37 and 1. 54 Indian companies could not be withdrawn in the process of amendment. Acts, 1956, Sections 348 and 349

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Madinah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.