MUMTAZ AHMED versus STATE
In the course of dealing with the prisoners, the Pakistan Penal Code section 302/34 evidence value three of the four investigating officers concluded that the accused had acted in their defense No witness was advised. That their conclusions were motivating, rather than derived. In criminal cases there was a fair consideration of the evidence which led to the incident of incitement or dishonesty by the accused in the vehicle parked in front of the house, who had objected to his deceased brother. And then the clash of the deceased and the complainant started with the accused who opened fire during the incident. The victim started the trouble and the accused has been accused of acting out of danger. Cannot be eliminated but it cannot be expected that it cannot be well calculated in the atmosphere of accusations. The accused, in the circumstances, was inappropriate and unfair the accused was sentenced, the trial court sentenced him to death.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer