Find a Lawyer

MST. ZANEB BIBI versus ABDUL RASHID

Plaintiffs for the possession and declaration of the Securities Relief Act 1877, Sections 122 and 123 of the Transferred Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 122 and 123 sought to declare with effect that their property was allegedly Was granted in favor of the defendants in exchange for the gift of. Contrary to its interests, illegal, collectible, over-wired, false and ineffective, the defendants claimed that the plaintiff, who was their sister, had gifted them the disputed property through a legally approved change and Evidence was lost by defendant to prove a legitimate gift in his favor and he had no reason why the plaintiff offered him a gift when he had children of his own and defendant. Ali had no liability with the defendant while he was with the plaintiff in his house and the defendants did not even charge him. Yes, she has an art service. They were presented to the plaintiff and did not come to him) n The record that the plaintiff loved the defendants so much that she would give away her property to her children. The trial court ruled the case after the definition of evidence on the record, but the appellate court set aside the trial court's ruling and ruling, the appellate court complied with the material irregularities in compliance with its jurisdiction. Was. In view of the petitions, evidence and the judgment and order rendered by the Appellate Court, the trial court's decision and order aside, the High Court exercised its jurisdiction to modify and set aside the trial court's persons. Restored. property advocate from Kharan lawyer